Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] sunxi: Support IRQ wakeup from deep sleep

On 1/22/21 4:47 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 07:33:54PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:

quoted

On 1/21/21 2:35 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:

quoted

On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 23:50:30 -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:

quoted

Allwinner sun6i/sun8i/sun50i SoCs (A31 and newer) have two interrupt
controllers: GIC and R_INTC. GIC does not support wakeup. R_INTC handles
the external NMI pin, and provides 32+ IRQs to the ARISC. The first 16
of these correspond 1:1 to a block of GIC IRQs starting with the NMI.
The last 13-16 multiplex the first (up to) 128 GIC SPIs.

This series replaces the existing chained irqchip driver that could only
control the NMI, with a stacked irqchip driver that also provides wakeup
capability for those multiplexed SPI IRQs. The idea is to preconfigure
the ARISC's IRQ controller, and then the ARISC firmware knows to wake up
as soon as it receives an IRQ. It can also decide how deep it can
suspend based on the enabled wakeup IRQs.

[...]

Applied to irq/irqchip-5.12, thanks!

[01/10] dt-bindings: irq: sun6i-r: Split the binding from sun7i-nmi
        commit: ad6b47cdef760410311f41876b21eb0c6fda4717
[02/10] dt-bindings: irq: sun6i-r: Add a compatible for the H3
        commit: 6436eb4417094ea3308b33d8392fc02a1068dc78
[03/10] irqchip/sun6i-r: Use a stacked irqchip driver
        commit: 4e34614636b31747b190488240a95647c227021f
[04/10] irqchip/sun6i-r: Add wakeup support
        commit: 7ab365f6cd6de1e2b0cb1e1e3873dbf68e6f1003

Please route the dts patches via the soc tree. Also, I had to
manually fix the first patch as it wouldn't apply on top of
5.11-rc4 (which tree has it been diffed against?). Please
check that the resolution is correct.

This series was based on sunxi/for-next, which contains commit
752b0aac99c7 ("dt-bindings: irq: sun7i-nmi: Add binding documentation
for the V3s NMI")[1].

I assume merging the DT bits alone would break things? If so, I guess we
can wait for 5.12 to be released before merging it

Patch 5 does not depend on the new driver, so it could be merged at any
time. Yes, the remaining patches would break things if merged without
the driver.

Cheers,
Samuel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel