On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:48:07PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:

On 1/14/2021 12:46 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:

quoted

On 1/5/21 1:22 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:

quoted

On 12/23/20 4:05 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:

quoted

On 12/16/2020 1:41 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote:

quoted

v3 -- discard commit from v2; instead rely on the new function
      reset_control_rearm provided in a recent commit [1] applied
      to reset/next.
   -- New commit to correct pcie-brcmstb.c usage of a reset controller
      to use reset/rearm verses deassert/assert.

v2 -- refactor rescal-reset driver to implement assert/deassert rather than
      reset because the reset call only fires once per lifetime and we need
      to reset after every resume from S2 or S3.
   -- Split the use of "ahci" and "rescal" controllers in separate fields
      to keep things simple.

v1 -- original


[1] Applied commit "reset: make shared pulsed reset controls re-triggerable"
    found at git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git
    branch reset/shared-retrigger

The changes in that branch above have now landed in Linus' tree with:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=557acb3d2cd9c82de19f944f6cc967a347735385

It would be good if we could get both patches applied via the same tree
or within the same cycle to avoid having either PCIe or SATA broken on
these platforms.

Ping? Can someone apply those patches if you are happy with them? Thank you.

Ping? Can we review and ideally also apply these patches? Thanks

Is there something going on preventing these patches from being reviewed
and/or applied?

It mentions a dependency, which makes it harder to apply.  I see that
dependency seems to have been applied, so maybe post an updated
version of the series, including both patches.

The series touches both ATA and PCI, so not immediately obvious where
it should go.  It looks like the ATA part is bigger, but only 2/2 went
to linux-pci, so it's harder to figure this out than it should be.  I
poked around a bit on lore, but I can't find 1/2 at all:

  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20201216214106.32851-1-james.quinlan@broadcom.com/ (local)

Maybe also include Nicolas Saenz Julienne [off-list ref]
directly in "To:".  I know I look at stuff addressed directly to me
first; the "CC:" flood gets overwhelming fast.  I assume Lorenzo will
look for at least an ack from Nicolas before doing anything.

If you repost, it's nice if you match existing style, e.g.,

  - PCI: brcmstb: use reset/rearm instead of deassert/assert
  + PCI: brcmstb: Use reset/rearm instead of deassert/assert

Bjorn

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel