Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: Fix kernel address detection of __is_lm_address()
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date: 2021-01-21 15:14:23
Also in:
lkml
[adding Ard] On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 01:19:55PM +0000, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
Currently, the __is_lm_address() check just masks out the top 12 bits of the address, but if they are 0, it still yields a true result. This has as a side effect that virt_addr_valid() returns true even for invalid virtual addresses (e.g. 0x0).
When it was added, __is_lm_address() was intended to distinguish valid
kernel virtual addresses (i.e. those in the TTBR1 address range), and
wasn't intended to do anything for addresses outside of this range. See
commit:
ec6d06efb0bac6cd ("arm64: Add support for CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL")
... where it simply tests a bit.
So I believe that it's working as intended (though this is poorly
documented), but I think you're saying that usage isn't aligned with
that intent. Given that, I'm not sure the fixes tag is right; I think it
has never had the semantic you're after.
I had thought the same was true for virt_addr_valid(), and that wasn't
expected to be called for VAs outside of the kernel VA range. Is it
actually safe to call that with NULL on other architectures?
I wonder if it's worth virt_addr_valid() having an explicit check for
the kernel VA range, instead.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Fix the detection checking that it's actually a kernel address starting at PAGE_OFFSET. Fixes: f4693c2716b35 ("arm64: mm: extend linear region for 52-bit VA configurations") Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h index 18fce223b67b..e04ac898ffe4 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static inline const void *__tag_set(const void *addr, u8 tag) /* * The linear kernel range starts at the bottom of the virtual address space. */ -#define __is_lm_address(addr) (((u64)(addr) & ~PAGE_OFFSET) < (PAGE_END - PAGE_OFFSET)) +#define __is_lm_address(addr) (((u64)(addr) ^ PAGE_OFFSET) < (PAGE_END - PAGE_OFFSET))
If we're going to make this stronger, can we please expand the comment with the intended semantic? Otherwise we're liable to break this in future. Thanks, Mark. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel