Hello Sasha,

On 20.01.21 15:26, Sasha Levin wrote:

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:08:15PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

quoted

On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:25:45 -0500 Sasha Levin wrote:

quoted

From: David Wu <redacted>

[ Upstream commit 5b55299eed78538cc4746e50ee97103a1643249c ]

Since the original mtu is not used when the mtu is updated,
the mtu is aligned with cache, this will get an incorrect.
For example, if you want to configure the mtu to be 1500,
but mtu 1536 is configured in fact.

Fixed: eaf4fac478077 ("net: stmmac: Do not accept invalid MTU values")
Signed-off-by: David Wu <redacted>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210113034109.27865-1-david.wu@rock-chips.com (local)
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

This was applied 6 days ago, I thought you said you wait two weeks.
What am I missing?

The "AUTOSEL" review cycle is an additional hurdle automatically
selected patches need to clear before being queued up. There are 7 days
between the day I sent the review for these and the first day I might
queue them up.

I guess this could benefit from being documented in
Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst? Or is this documented
elsewhere?

This mail isn't an indication that the patch has been added to the
queue, it's just an extra step to give folks time to object.

If you add up all the days you'll get >14 :)

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel