Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/mediatek: Change disp/ddp term to mutex in mtk mutex driver
From: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-01-21 02:57:21
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-mediatek, lkml
Hi, Matthias: Matthias Brugger [off-list ref] 於 2021年1月21日 週四 上午2:27寫道:
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 07:17:27AM +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:quoted
From: CK Hu <redacted> mtk mutex is used by both drm and mdp driver, so change disp/ddp term to mutex to show that it's a common driver for drm and mdp. Signed-off-by: CK Hu <redacted> Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c | 30 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c | 305 ++++++++++++------------ drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.h | 26 +- 5 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)[...]quoted
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c index 1c8a253f4788..98a060bf225d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c[...]quoted
-static const struct of_device_id ddp_driver_dt_match[] = { +static const struct of_device_id mutex_driver_dt_match[] = { { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-mutex", - .data = &mt2701_ddp_driver_data}, + .data = &mt2701_mutex_driver_data}, { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-disp-mutex", - .data = &mt2712_ddp_driver_data}, + .data = &mt2712_mutex_driver_data}, { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8167-disp-mutex", - .data = &mt8167_ddp_driver_data}, + .data = &mt8167_mutex_driver_data}, { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-mutex", - .data = &mt8173_ddp_driver_data}, + .data = &mt8173_mutex_driver_data}, {}, }; -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ddp_driver_dt_match); +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mutex_driver_dt_match);I think it would make sense in a follow-up patch to update the binding to use "mediatek,mt2701-mutex" to reflect that mutex is used for drm and mdp driver. Make sense?
Yes, it make sense. I would try to update the binding, but I wonder device tree should be backward compatible? Let's discuss in that follow-up patches. Regards, Chun-Kuang.
Regards, Matthias
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel