On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 5:11 PM Heiko Stübner [off-list ref] wrote:

Am Mittwoch, 6. Januar 2021, 14:46:14 CET schrieb Chen-Yu Tsai:

quoted

From: Chen-Yu Tsai <redacted>

The Rockchip PCIe controller DT binding clearly states that 'ep-gpios' is
an optional property. And indeed there are boards that don't require it.

Make the driver follow the binding by using devm_gpiod_get_optional()
instead of devm_gpiod_get().

Fixes: e77f847df54c ("PCI: rockchip: Add Rockchip PCIe controller support")
Fixes: 956cd99b35a8 ("PCI: rockchip: Separate common code from RC driver")
Fixes: 964bac9455be ("PCI: rockchip: Split out rockchip_pcie_parse_dt() to parse DT")
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <redacted>
---
Heiko, I dropped you reviewed-by due to the error message change

Changes since v2:
  - Fix error message for failed GPIO

Changes since v1:
  - Rewrite subject to match existing convention and reference
    'ep-gpios' DT property instead of the 'ep_gpio' field
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
index 904dec0d3a88..90c957e3bc73 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c

@@ -118,9 +118,10 @@ int rockchip_pcie_parse_dt(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
      }

      if (rockchip->is_rc) {
-             rockchip->ep_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "ep", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
+             rockchip->ep_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "ep", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
              if (IS_ERR(rockchip->ep_gpio)) {
-                     dev_err(dev, "missing ep-gpios property in node\n");
+                     dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rockchip->ep_gpio),
+                                   "failed to get ep GPIO\n");
                      return PTR_ERR(rockchip->ep_gpio);

looking at [0] shouldn't that be just
        return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(.....)...);
instead of dev_err_probe + additional return?

You're right. I was only expecting dev_err_probe() to deal with -EPROBE_DEFER.
I believe there won't be any future changes that would add any code here,
so I'll respin with the proper changes you mentioned.

Thanks!

ChenYu

Heiko

[0] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/base/core.c#L4223

quoted

              }
      }

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel