On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 10:09:56 +0100
Bartosz Golaszewski [off-list ref] wrote:

On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 1:04 PM Jonathan Cameron [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:15:15 +0000
Anand Ashok Dumbre [off-list ref] wrote:
 

quoted

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Sent: Monday 30 November 2020 8:21 PM
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <redacted>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>; Peter Meerwald-Stadler
[off-list ref]; Michal Simek [off-list ref]; linux-
iio@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
kernel@vger.kernel.org; Bartosz Golaszewski
[off-list ref]; Anand Ashok Dumbre
[off-list ref]
Subject: Re: [PATH v3 0/3] iio: adc: xilinx: use even more devres

On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:27:56 +0100
Bartosz Golaszewski [off-list ref] wrote:
 

quoted

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <redacted>

This is a follow-up to commit 750628c79bb1 ("iio: adc: xilinx-xadc:
use devm_krealloc()"). I noticed we can use even more devres helpers
and entirely drop the remove() callback.

v1 -> v2:
- squash three patches adding more devres calls into one for easier
review
- don't insist on the 80 characters limit
- add a new helper: devm_krealloc_array() and use it

v2 -> v3:
- drop the devm_krealloc_array() helper

Bartosz Golaszewski (3):
  iio: adc: xilinx: use helper variable for &pdev->dev
  iio: adc: xilinx: use devm_krealloc() instead of kfree() + kcalloc()
  iio: adc: xilinx: use more devres helpers and remove remove()

 drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c | 157
++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
 

Series looks good to me but would like to leave it a little longer to let others
take a look at it. That will probably mean it falls into next cycle now.

+CC Anand who is looking at another series touching this driver and
+might
give this one a spin as well.

Thanks,

Jonathan  

Hi Jonathan, Bartosz,

I have tested and reviewed the patch and everything looks good.
I have another patch series on the same files that might cause conflicts.

Reviewed-by: Anand Ashok Dumbre <redacted>
Tested-by: Anand Ashok Dumbre <redacted>  

Thanks,

Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for
the autobuilders to play with it.

There was a small amount of fuzz.

Thanks,

Jonathan
 

Hi Jonathan,

I still don't see these patches in next - is any action required of me
to get this in for the next release?

Nope.  I still haven't gotten round to asking for the iio tree itself
to be pulled into next, and I've been a bit busy so haven't yet sent a
pull request to Greg KH this cycle.

I'll get the second sorted, probably later this week.

J

Bartosz

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel