Re: [PATCH 1/2] kasan, mm: fix conflicts with init_on_alloc/free
From: Andrey Konovalov <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-14 15:32:46
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 6:25 PM Vlastimil Babka [off-list ref] wrote:
On 1/13/21 5:03 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:quoted
A few places where SLUB accesses object's data or metadata were missed in a previous patch. This leads to false positives with hardware tag-based KASAN when bulk allocations are used with init_on_alloc/free. Fix the false-positives by resetting pointer tags during these accesses. Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/I50dd32838a666e173fe06c3c5c766f2c36aae901 Fixes: aa1ef4d7b3f67 ("kasan, mm: reset tags when accessing metadata") Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <redacted>Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <redacted>quoted
--- mm/slub.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c index dc5b42e700b8..75fb097d990d 100644 --- a/mm/slub.c +++ b/mm/slub.c@@ -2791,7 +2791,8 @@ static __always_inline void maybe_wipe_obj_freeptr(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj) { if (unlikely(slab_want_init_on_free(s)) && obj) - memset((void *)((char *)obj + s->offset), 0, sizeof(void *)); + memset((void *)((char *)kasan_reset_tag(obj) + s->offset), + 0, sizeof(void *)); } /*@@ -2883,7 +2884,7 @@ static __always_inline void *slab_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *s, stat(s, ALLOC_FASTPATH); } - maybe_wipe_obj_freeptr(s, kasan_reset_tag(object)); + maybe_wipe_obj_freeptr(s, object);And in that case the reset was unnecessary, right. (commit log only mentions adding missing resets).
The reset has been moved into maybe_wipe_obj_freeptr(). I'll mention it in the changelog in v2. Thanks! _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel