Re: Aarch64 EXT4FS inode checksum failures - seems to be weak memory ordering issues
From: Florian Weimer <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-12 13:33:40
* Lukas Wunner:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 12:02:53PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:quoted
I appreciate Arnd pointing out "--std=gnu11", though. What are the actual relevant language improvements? Variable declarations in for-loops is the only one I can think of. I think that would clean up some code (and some macros), but might not be compelling on its own.Anonymous structs/unions. I used to have a use case for that in struct efi_dev_path in include/linux/efi.h, but Ard Biesheuvel refactored it in a gnu89-compatible way for v5.7 with db8952e7094f.
Aren't those a GNU extension supported since GCC 3.0? Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel