Re: [RFC 1/2] arm64/mm: Fix pfn_valid() for ZONE_DEVICE based memory
From: David Hildenbrand <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-11 10:32:53
Also in:
lkml
On 04.01.21 07:18, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 12/22/20 2:41 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:quoted
On 22.12.20 08:12, Anshuman Khandual wrote:quoted
pfn_valid() validates a pfn but basically it checks for a valid struct page backing for that pfn. It should always return positive for memory ranges backed with struct page mapping. But currently pfn_valid() fails for all ZONE_DEVICE based memory types even though they have struct page mapping. pfn_valid() asserts that there is a memblock entry for a given pfn without MEMBLOCK_NOMAP flag being set. The problem with ZONE_DEVICE based memory is that they do not have memblock entries. Hence memblock_is_map_memory() will invariably fail via memblock_search() for a ZONE_DEVICE based address. This eventually fails pfn_valid() which is wrong. memblock_is_map_memory() needs to be skipped for such memory ranges. As ZONE_DEVICE memory gets hotplugged into the system via memremap_pages() called from a driver, their respective memory sections will not have SECTION_IS_EARLY set. Normal hotplug memory will never have MEMBLOCK_NOMAP set in their memblock regions. Because the flag MEMBLOCK_NOMAP was specifically designed and set for firmware reserved memory regions. memblock_is_map_memory() can just be skipped as its always going to be positive and that will be an optimization for the normal hotplug memory. Like ZONE_DEVIE based memory, all hotplugged normal memory too will not have SECTION_IS_EARLY set for their sections. Skipping memblock_is_map_memory() for all non early memory sections would fix pfn_valid() problem for ZONE_DEVICE based memory and also improve its performance for normal hotplug memory as well. Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 73b20c84d42d ("arm64: mm: implement pte_devmap support") Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <redacted> --- arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c index 75addb36354a..ee23bda00c28 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c@@ -225,6 +225,18 @@ int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn) if (!valid_section(__pfn_to_section(pfn))) return 0; + + /* + * ZONE_DEVICE memory does not have the memblock entries. + * memblock_is_map_memory() check for ZONE_DEVICE based + * addresses will always fail. Even the normal hotplugged + * memory will never have MEMBLOCK_NOMAP flag set in their + * memblock entries. Skip memblock search for all non early + * memory sections covering all of hotplug memory including + * both normal and ZONE_DEVIE based. + */ + if (!early_section(__pfn_to_section(pfn))) + return 1;Actually, I think we want to check for partial present sections. Maybe we can rather switch to generic pfn_valid() and tweak it to something likediff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h index fb3bf696c05e..7b1fcce5bd5a 100644 --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h@@ -1382,9 +1382,13 @@ static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn) return 0; /* * Traditionally early sections always returned pfn_valid() for - * the entire section-sized span. + * the entire section-sized span. Some archs might have holes in + * early sections, so double check with memblock if configured. */ - return early_section(ms) || pfn_section_valid(ms, pfn); + if (early_section(ms)) + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EARLY_SECTION_MEMMAP_HOLES) ? + memblock_is_map_memory(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) : 1; + return pfn_section_valid(ms, pfn); } #endifCould not find CONFIG_EARLY_SECTION_MEMMAP_HOLES. Are you suggesting to create this config which could track platform scenarios where all early sections might not have mmap coverage such as arm64 ?
Yes, a new config that states what's actually happening.
quoted
Which users are remaining that require us to add/remove memblocks when hot(un)plugging memory $ git grep KEEP_MEM | grep memory_hotplug mm/memory_hotplug.c: if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK)) mm/memory_hotplug.c: if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK)) mm/memory_hotplug.c: if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK)) {Did not follow, do we want to drop ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK ? Without it arm64 will not be able to track MEMBLOCK_NOMAP memory at runtime.
I'd only like the hot(un)plug parts gone for now, if possible: I don't see the need for that handling really that cannot be handled easier, as in the proposed pfn_valid() changes. I understand that current handling of memory holes in early sections and memory marked as MEMBLOCK_NOMAP requires ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK for now.
quoted
I think one user we would have to handle is arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c:valid_phys_addr_range(). AFAIS, powerpc at least does not rely on memblock_is_map_memory.memblock_is_map_memory() is currently used only on arm/arm64 platforms. Apart from the above example in valid_phys_addr_range(), there are some other memblock_is_map_memory() call sites as well. But then, we are not trying to completely drop memblock_is_map_memory() or are we ?
No, just change the semantics: only relevant for early sections. Imagine freezing MEMBLOCK state after boot. Only early sections can have memory holes and might be marked MEMBLOCK_NOMAP. For hotplugged memory, we don't have to call memblock_is_map_memory(). -- Thanks, David / dhildenb _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel