Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] scheduler: expose the topology of clusters and add cluster scheduler
From: Morten Rasmussen <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-08 15:13:39
Also in:
linux-acpi, lkml
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 03:16:47PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
On 1/6/21 12:30 AM, Barry Song wrote:quoted
ARM64 server chip Kunpeng 920 has 6 clusters in each NUMA node, and each cluster has 4 cpus. All clusters share L3 cache data while each cluster has local L3 tag. On the other hand, each cluster will share some internal system bus. This means cache is much more affine inside one cluster than across clusters.There is a similar need for clustering in x86. Some x86 cores could share L2 caches that is similar to the cluster in Kupeng 920 (e.g. on Jacobsville there are 6 clusters of 4 Atom cores, each cluster sharing a separate L2, and 24 cores sharing L3). Having a sched domain at the L2 cluster helps spread load among L2 domains. This will reduce L2 cache contention and help with performance for low to moderate load scenarios.
IIUC, you are arguing for the exact opposite behaviour, i.e. balancing between L2 caches while Barry is after consolidating tasks within the boundaries of a L3 tag cache. One helps cache utilization, the other communication latency between tasks. Am I missing something? IMHO, we need some numbers on the table to say which way to go. Looking at just benchmarks of one type doesn't show that this is a good idea in general. Morten _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel