Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 3 authors, 2021-01-04

Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add PRU consumer bindings

From: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Date: 2021-01-04 19:56:48
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-omap, linux-remoteproc, lkml

Also, I think you can get rid of 'ti,pruss-gp-mux-sel'. Can't it just
be an arg cell in 'ti,prus' entries?

Rob
+1 for using cells instead of a separate property.

FYI, we will have a similar issue with the PRUSSEVTSEL signal for the
interrupt controller on the AM18XX. I am still of the opinion (described
in more detail at [1]) that using a cell for this makes for both better
device tree bindings and easier driver implementation. So I am interested
to see what the resolution is here.

[1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20190708035243.12170-5-s-anna@ti.com/

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help