On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 12:41 AM Ray Jui [off-list ref] wrote:

On 12/16/2020 8:08 PM, Rayagonda Kokatanur wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 11:14 PM Ray Jui [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 12/2/2020 6:35 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:

quoted

quoted

All review comments are scattered now, please let me know what has to be
done further,
Are we going to change the tasklet to irq thread ?
Are we going to remove batching 64 packets if transaction > 64B and use rx
fifo threshold ?

I don't see any issue with current code but if it has to change we need a
valid reason for the same.
If nothing to be done, please acknowledge the patch.

Valid request. Has there been any news?

Sorry for the delay. I just replied.

This patch is tested and validated with all corner cases and its working.
Can we merge this and take up any improvement as part of separate patch?

I think that makes sense, and I'm okay with these patches going in as
they are now.

Acked-by: Ray Jui <redacted>

Thank you.

But please help to collect precise FIFO access timing (later when you
have time), that would allow us to know if the current defer-to-tasklet
(instead of thread) based approach makes sense or not.

Thanks,

Ray

quoted

Thanks,
Rayagonda

quoted

Thanks,

Ray

-- 
This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted 
with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain 
information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy 
laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are 
not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the 
e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, 
copying, distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of 
this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, 
please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and 
destroy any printed copy of it.