Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 4 authors, 2020-11-28

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] device: provide devm_krealloc_array()

From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-11-28 22:05:03
Also in: linux-iio, lkml

On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 12:38:26 +0100
Bartosz Golaszewski [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 11:18 AM Bartosz Golaszewski
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 5:16 PM Greg KH [off-list ref] wrote:  
quoted
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:46:41PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:  
quoted
On Mon,  2 Nov 2020 15:22:25 +0100
Bartosz Golaszewski [off-list ref] wrote:
 
quoted
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <redacted>

When allocating an array of elements, users should check for
multiplication overflow or preferably use one of the provided helpers
like: devm_kmalloc_array().

This provides devm_krealloc_array() for users who want to reallocate
managed arrays.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <redacted>  
+CC Greg KH.

As this is going into a very generic place I'd like a relevant ack.
That file is a bit of a wild west for acks, but Greg seems most
appropriate person.

So Greg, any comments on this one?  
As there is only 1 user of this function in the patch series, you don't
save any extra code space here, I don't think this is worth it.
 
It's worth it in that the overflow check before allocation doesn't
seem to belong in a driver IMO but is a general check that should live
in common code.
 
quoted
We are seeing less and less gains from these new devm_* additions, and
only more confusion and problems with them.  So perhaps don't add this?
I don't think it is needed.
 
I think you're referring to the discussion on
devm_platform_ioremap_resource()? I would argue that consolidation of
common operations in helpers is rarely a bad thing but it's a
discussion for another thread.

I'm not too attached to this patch - if you think this should be
dropped then fine, but I don't see how the name devm_krealloc_array()
can confuse anyone.
 
Greg: what's the final call on this?
Reroll the series without this patch.  If it turns out to be a good idea
in the long run we can always bring it back, but for now it's blocking
the rest of the series.

Thanks,

Jonathan
Bartosz

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help