Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] device: provide devm_krealloc_array()
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-11-28 22:05:03
Also in:
linux-iio, lkml
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 12:38:26 +0100 Bartosz Golaszewski [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 11:18 AM Bartosz Golaszewski [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 5:16 PM Greg KH [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:46:41PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:quoted
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:22:25 +0100 Bartosz Golaszewski [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <redacted> When allocating an array of elements, users should check for multiplication overflow or preferably use one of the provided helpers like: devm_kmalloc_array(). This provides devm_krealloc_array() for users who want to reallocate managed arrays. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <redacted>+CC Greg KH. As this is going into a very generic place I'd like a relevant ack. That file is a bit of a wild west for acks, but Greg seems most appropriate person. So Greg, any comments on this one?As there is only 1 user of this function in the patch series, you don't save any extra code space here, I don't think this is worth it.It's worth it in that the overflow check before allocation doesn't seem to belong in a driver IMO but is a general check that should live in common code.quoted
We are seeing less and less gains from these new devm_* additions, and only more confusion and problems with them. So perhaps don't add this? I don't think it is needed.I think you're referring to the discussion on devm_platform_ioremap_resource()? I would argue that consolidation of common operations in helpers is rarely a bad thing but it's a discussion for another thread. I'm not too attached to this patch - if you think this should be dropped then fine, but I don't see how the name devm_krealloc_array() can confuse anyone.Greg: what's the final call on this?
Reroll the series without this patch. If it turns out to be a good idea in the long run we can always bring it back, but for now it's blocking the rest of the series. Thanks, Jonathan
Bartosz
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel