Re: [patch 14/19] softirq: Make softirq control and processing RT aware
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-11-23 13:45:13
Also in:
linux-sh, linux-um, lkml
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 03:02:21PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
+void __local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
+{
+ bool preempt_on = preemptible();
+ unsigned long flags;
+ u32 pending;
+ int curcnt;
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq());
+ lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ curcnt = this_cpu_read(softirq_ctrl.cnt);
+
+ /*
+ * If this is not reenabling soft interrupts, no point in trying to
+ * run pending ones.
+ */
+ if (curcnt != cnt)
+ goto out;
+
+ pending = local_softirq_pending();
+ if (!pending || ksoftirqd_running(pending))
+ goto out;
+
+ /*
+ * If this was called from non preemptible context, wake up the
+ * softirq daemon.
+ */
+ if (!preempt_on) {
+ wakeup_softirqd();
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Adjust softirq count to SOFTIRQ_OFFSET which makes
+ * in_serving_softirq() become true.
+ */
+ cnt = SOFTIRQ_OFFSET;
+ __local_bh_enable(cnt, false);But then you enter __do_softirq() with softirq_count() == SOFTIRQ_OFFSET. __do_softirq() calls softirq_handle_begin() which then sets it back to SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET...
+ __do_softirq(); + +out: + __local_bh_enable(cnt, preempt_on);
You escape from there with a correct preempt_count() but still the softirq executes under SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET and not SOFTIRQ_OFFSET, making in_serving_softirq() false.
+ local_irq_restore(flags); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__local_bh_enable_ip);
Thanks. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel