On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 04:26:52PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:

EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe

Hello,

On 18/11/2020 16:03:36+0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote:

quoted

At first glance, there is no trivial way to register the pin range in the
pinctrl-at91 driver. There is one driver for the pinctrl and one for the gpio.
I am open to suggestions to fix it in the pinctrl-at91 driver as well if there
is an elegant way (I have some in mind, but there are not) without having to
refactor the driver.

But shouldn't that driver be refactored at some point anyway? I know you
are moving away with new SoCs but it causes real issues. For example,
gpio hogs are not working, this is impacting some of your customers.

I agree, maintainance of this driver is difficult because of its design.
Unfortunately, I doubt being able to hadnle a refactoring of this driver in a
near future.

The other thing is the weird probe order preventing a nice cleanup of
the platform code.

True. IMO, having gpio controlers probed before pinctrl is one of the reason
which prevents a trivial fix.

Regards

Ludovic

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel