RE: [PATCH v7 2/7] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs
From: ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com <hidden>
Date: 2020-11-18 12:01:51
Also in:
lkml
Hi Sumit,
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Subject: [PATCH v7 2/7] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs Add support to handle SGIs as pseudo NMIs. As SGIs or IPIs default to a special flow handler: handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_ipi(), so skip NMI handler update in case of SGIs. Also, enable NMI support prior to gic_smp_init() as allocation of SGIs as IRQs/NMIs happen as part of this routine. Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <redacted> --- drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c index16fecc0..7010ae2 100644--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c@@ -461,6 +461,7 @@ static u32 gic_get_ppi_index(struct irq_data *d)static int gic_irq_nmi_setup(struct irq_data *d) { struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(d->irq); + u32 idx; if (!gic_supports_nmi()) return -EINVAL;@@ -478,16 +479,22 @@ static int gic_irq_nmi_setup(struct irq_data *d) return -EINVAL; /* desc lock should already be held */ - if (gic_irq_in_rdist(d)) { - u32 idx = gic_get_ppi_index(d); + switch (get_intid_range(d)) { + case SGI_RANGE: + break; + case PPI_RANGE: + case EPPI_RANGE: + idx = gic_get_ppi_index(d); /* Setting up PPI as NMI, only switch handler for first NMI */ if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&ppi_nmi_refs[idx])) { refcount_set(&ppi_nmi_refs[idx], 1); desc->handle_irq =handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_nmi; } - } else { + break; + default: desc->handle_irq = handle_fasteoi_nmi; + break; } gic_irq_set_prio(d, GICD_INT_NMI_PRI); @@ -498,6 +505,7 @@ static int gic_irq_nmi_setup(struct irq_data *d) static void gic_irq_nmi_teardown(struct irq_data *d) { struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(d->irq); + u32 idx; if (WARN_ON(!gic_supports_nmi())) return;@@ -515,14 +523,20 @@ static void gic_irq_nmi_teardown(struct irq_data *d) return; /* desc lock should already be held */ - if (gic_irq_in_rdist(d)) { - u32 idx = gic_get_ppi_index(d); + switch (get_intid_range(d)) { + case SGI_RANGE: + break; + case PPI_RANGE: + case EPPI_RANGE: + idx = gic_get_ppi_index(d); /* Tearing down NMI, only switch handler for last NMI */ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&ppi_nmi_refs[idx])) desc->handle_irq = handle_percpu_devid_irq; - } else { + break; + default: desc->handle_irq = handle_fasteoi_irq; + break; } gic_irq_set_prio(d, GICD_INT_DEF_PRI); @@ -1708,6 +1722,7 @@static int __init gic_init_bases(void __iomem *dist_base, gic_dist_init(); gic_cpu_init(); + gic_enable_nmi_support(); gic_smp_init(); gic_cpu_pm_init();@@ -1719,8 +1734,6 @@ static int __init gic_init_bases(void __iomem*dist_base, gicv2m_init(handle, gic_data.domain); } - gic_enable_nmi_support(); - return 0; out_free: -- 2.7.4
I checked for this patch and I think that's good. I've tested this patch with FX1000 used my other patches. The result is as follows. $ echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/panic_on_rcu_stal $ echo HARDLOCKUP > /sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash/DIRECT : kernel panics and crash kernel boot : makedumpfile saves the system state at HARDLOCKUP in vmcore. crash utility: #7 [fffffe0029e4fd30] lkdtm_HARDLOCKUP at fffffe0010856eec #8 [fffffe0029e4fd40] direct_entry at fffffe0010856c94 #9 [fffffe0029e4fd90] full_proxy_write at fffffe001055ced0 #10 [fffffe0029e4fdd0] vfs_write at fffffe001047436c #11 [fffffe0029e4fe10] ksys_write at fffffe001047466c #12 [fffffe0029e4fe60] __arm64_sys_write at fffffe0010474718 #13 [fffffe0029e4fe70] do_el0_svc at fffffe00101590cc #14 [fffffe0029e4fea0] el0_svc at fffffe0010147a30 #15 [fffffe0029e4feb0] el0_sync_handler at fffffe001014835c #16 [fffffe0029e4fff0] el0_sync at fffffe0010142c14 Best regards, Yuichi Ito _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel