Hello

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 08:51:42PM +0800, Zhang Qilong wrote:

quoted

The 'break' is not possoble to be reached

s/possoble/possible/

quoted

because of previous 'return', discard it.

Given that this such a patch was already sent a week ago[1], I wonder if there
is a tool that complains here? If so, mentioning it in the commit log would be
good.

Other than that I still think that there should be at least an empty line instead
of the break, as I already wrote in reply to the first patch. And having said that I
also don't think this is worth "fixing", seeing the break in a switch statement is
good for human readers.

Best regards
Uwe

I have seen that patch, thank you for nice reminding. It's not a tool tip. I find it
when reading that code. So sending the patch to optimize it. It also looks good
to keep 'break'.
Thanks, best wish to you!
Zhang Qilong

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201019175915.3718-1-trix@redhat.com (local)
--
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König
|
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel