Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: aspeed: soc changes for 5.10
From: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Date: 2020-10-07 11:20:13
Also in:
linux-aspeed
On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 at 20:31, Olof Johansson [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Joel, On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 06:31:28AM +0000, Joel Stanley wrote:quoted
Hello Soc maintainers, Here are some ASPEED changes for the 5.10 merge window. The following changes since commit e55f541e51b5136fc0ced0bdf2b33ee3cca3bc96: soc: aspeed: xdma: Add reset ioctl (2020-09-25 15:32:57 +0930) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joel/aspeed.git tags/aspeed-5.10-soc for you to fetch changes up to e55f541e51b5136fc0ced0bdf2b33ee3cca3bc96: soc: aspeed: xdma: Add reset ioctl (2020-09-25 15:32:57 +0930) ---------------------------------------------------------------- ASPEED soc driver updates for 5.10 New drivers: - XDMA driver for the BMC to host PCIe DMA deviceI don't think this driver belongs in drivers/soc, it's not "soc glue logic", and it has a userspace interface. Some of the commits even references it as a "misc driver". Mind resubmitting it for drivers/misc instead?
(Argh I missed this mail) We used to have the various little drivers in drivers/misc, but somewhere along the line we decided to move them to drivers/soc. I think that was Arnd asking Patrick Venture? https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CAK8P3a3CK4o8KnD6M084ULEmm+6_CtNFqYHjSqE5vp+U9YAmkA@mail.gmail.com/ (local) The existing drivers have userspace interfaces for misc parts of the aspeed chip, mostly relating to the strange (from a traditional Linux/host perspective) interfaces it exposes to the host. This XDMA driver should go alongside those other drivers. With that context, how would you like to proceed? Cheers, Joel _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel