Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: power: Add MT8167 power domains
From: Enric Balletbo i Serra <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-30 11:43:34
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, lkml
Hi Fabien, Thank you for the patch and base it on [0] On 27/10/20 14:11, Fabien Parent wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Add power domains dt-bindings for MT8167. Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <redacted> --- This patch depends on the SCPSYS PM domains driver [0]. v2: * Implement on top of new SCPSYS PM domains driver [0] [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=370737 .../power/mediatek,power-controller.yaml | 2 ++ include/dt-bindings/power/mt8167-power.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/mt8167-power.hdiff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/mediatek,power-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/mediatek,power-controller.yaml index 0318ffb1133c..73e5452c3a5d 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/mediatek,power-controller.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/mediatek,power-controller.yaml@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties: compatible: enum: + - mediatek,mt8167-power-controller - mediatek,mt8173-power-controller - mediatek,mt8183-power-controller - mediatek,mt8192-power-controller@@ -59,6 +60,7 @@ patternProperties: reg: description: | Power domain index. Valid values are defined in: + "include/dt-bindings/power/mt8167-power.h" - for MT8167 type power domain. "include/dt-bindings/power/mt8173-power.h" - for MT8173 type power domain. "include/dt-bindings/power/mt8183-power.h" - for MT8183 type power domain. "include/dt-bindings/power/mt8192-power.h" - for MT8192 type power domain.diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/mt8167-power.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/mt8167-power.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7e3babfc2eef --- /dev/null +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/mt8167-power.h@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + * + * Copyright (c) 2020 MediaTek Inc. + */ + +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_POWER_MT8167_POWER_H +#define _DT_BINDINGS_POWER_MT8167_POWER_H + +#define MT8167_POWER_DOMAIN_MM 0 +#define MT8167_POWER_DOMAIN_DISP 0
Is that correct? Both domains have the same index?
+#define MT8167_POWER_DOMAIN_VDEC 1 +#define MT8167_POWER_DOMAIN_ISP 2 +#define MT8167_POWER_DOMAIN_CONN 3 +#define MT8167_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG_ASYNC 4 +#define MT8167_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG_2D 5 +#define MT8167_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG 6 + +#endif /* _DT_BINDINGS_POWER_MT8167_POWER_H */
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel