Re: [RFC 0/3] clk: imx: Implement blk-ctl driver for i.MX8MN
From: Adam Ford <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-26 15:13:10
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-devicetree, lkml
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 9:55 AM Abel Vesa [off-list ref] wrote:
On 20-10-25 11:05:32, Adam Ford wrote:quoted
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 7:19 AM Marek Vasut [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 10/25/20 1:05 PM, Abel Vesa wrote: [...]quoted
quoted
Together, both the GPC and the clk-blk driver should be able to pull the multimedia block out of reset. Currently, the GPC can handle the USB OTG and the GPU, but the LCDIF and MIPI DSI appear to be gated by the clock block My original patch RFC didn't include the imx8mn node, because it hangs, but the node I added looks like: media_blk_ctl: clock-controller@32e28000 { compatible = "fsl,imx8mn-media-blk-ctl", "syscon"; reg = <0x32e28000 0x1000>; #clock-cells = <1>; #reset-cells = <1>; }; I was hoping you might have some feedback on the 8mn clk-blk driver since you did the 8mp clk-blk drive and they appear to be very similar.I'll do you one better still. I'll apply the patch in my tree and give it a test tomorrow morning.I do have some more updates on how to get the system to not hang, and to enumerate more clocks. Looking at Marek's work on enabling clocks in the 8MM, he added a power-domain in dispmix_blk_ctl pointing to the dispmix in the GPC. By forcing the GPC driver to write 0x1fff to 32e28004, 0x7f to 32e28000 and 0x30000 to 32e28008, the i.MX8MM can bring the display clocks out of reset.Yeah, that makes sense. Basically, it was trying to disable unused clocks (see clk_disable_unused) but in order to disable the clocks from the media BLK_CTL (which I think should be renamed in display BLK_CTL) the PD need to be on. Since you initially didn't give it any PD, it was trying to blindly write/read the gate bit and therefore freeze.quoted
Unfortunately, the i.MX8MN needs to have 0x100 written to both 32e28000 and 32e28004, and the values written for the 8MM are not compatible. By forcing the GPC to write those values, I can get lcdif_pixel_clk and the mipi_dsi_clkref appearing on the Nano.I'm trying to make a branch with all the patches for all i.MX8M so I can keep track of it all. On this branch I've also applied the following patchset from Lucas Stach: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg843007.html but I'm getting the folowing errors: [ 16.690885] imx-pgc imx-pgc-domain.3: failed to power up ADB400 [ 16.716839] imx-pgc imx-pgc-domain.3: failed to power up ADB400 [ 16.730500] imx-pgc imx-pgc-domain.3: failed to power up ADB400 Lucas, any thoughts? Maybe it's something related to 8MN.
I will go back and double check this now that we have both the blt_crl->power-domain and the power-domain->blk_ctl.
Will dig further, see what pops out.
I wasn't sure which direction to go with the name. I can rename the media_blk_ctl driver to display_blk_ctl. I used Media based on the imx8mp naming convention and the fact that it's controlling both the display and the camera interface, however it's depending on the dispmix GPC. I'll submit a RFC V2 with the cross referencing to the GPC based on Marek's Mini patch set, but we'll still have an issue where the Mini and Nano have different syscon values to enable the clocks, and Marek's branch has it card-coded, so my patch would effectively break the Mini in order to make the Nano operate until we find a better solution. adam
quoted
video_pll1_ref_sel 0 0 0 24000000 0 0 50000 video_pll1 0 0 0 594000000 0 0 50000 video_pll1_bypass 0 0 0 594000000 0 0 50000 video_pll1_out 0 0 0 594000000 0 0 50000 disp_pixel 0 0 0 594000000 0 0 50000 lcdif_pixel_clk 0 0 0 594000000 0 0 50000 disp_pixel_clk 0 0 0 594000000 0 0 50000 dsi_phy_ref 0 0 0 27000000 0 0 50000 mipi_dsi_clkref 0 0 0 27000000 0 0 50000 I am not 100% certain the clock parents in the clk block driver for the 8MN are correct, and I am not seeing the mipi_dsi_pclk Once the dust settles on the GPC decision for Mini and Nano, I think we'll need a more generic way to pass the bits we need to set in clock block to the GPC. adam
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel