On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 02:58:55 +0100,
Masayoshi Mizuma [off-list ref] wrote:
[...]
quoted
+void ipi_nmi_setup(int cpu)
+{
+ if (!ipi_desc)
+ return;
ipi_nmi_setup() may be called twice for CPU0:
set_smp_ipi_range => set_smp_ipi_nmi => ipi_nmi_setup
=> ipi_setup => ipi_nmi_setup
Actually, I got the following error message via the second ipi_nmi_setup():
GICv3: Pseudo-NMIs enabled using relaxed ICC_PMR_EL1 synchronisation
GICv3: Cannot set NMI property of enabled IRQ 8
genirq: Failed to setup NMI delivery: irq 8
Why don't we have a check to prevent that? Like as:
if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, ipi_desc->percpu_enabled))
return;
That's definitely the wrong thing to do. prepare_nmi_setup() shouldn't
be called twice, and papering over it isn't acceptable.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel