Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 3 authors, 2020-10-01

Re: [PATCH 11/11] soc: ti: k3-socinfo: Add entry for AM64 SoC family

From: Peter Ujfalusi <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-01 06:42:03
Also in: lkml

Hi Grygorii,

On 30/09/2020 16.56, Grygorii Strashko wrote:

On 28/09/2020 11:34, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
quoted
It's JTAG PARTNO is 0xBB38.

Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <redacted>
---
  drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
index bbbc2d2b7091..a14ec68846dd 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ static const struct k3_soc_id {
      { 0xBB5A, "AM65X" },
      { 0xBB64, "J721E" },
      { 0xBB6D, "J7200" },
+    { 0xBB38, "AM64" }
Shouldn't it be AM64X
Good point, I'll fix this up and then the DMA series.

While here, what do you think: should we keep the DMA compatibles as I
have them in v1 (am64-dmss-bcdma and am64-dmss-pktdma):
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200930091412.8020-10-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com/ (local)
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200930091412.8020-11-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com/ (local)

or change them to am64x-dmss-* ?

I'll ask Rob on the binding doc patches as well.
quoted
  };
    static int
- Péter

Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help