Re: [PATCH 00/12] ARM: use adr_l/ldr_l macros for PC-relative references
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Date: 2020-09-18 20:04:41
Also in:
linux-efi
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:01 PM Ard Biesheuvel [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 00:25, Nick Desaulniers [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Also, it looks like the GCC build of milbeaut_m10v_defconfig fails to boot for me in QEMU; so maybe not just a Clang bug (or maybe, more than one bug). (or maybe one of my command line params to QEMU is wrong).I understand that this is actually an existing issue in -next, but in general, why would you expect to be able to boot milbeaut_m10v_defconfig on anything other than a Milbeaut MV10 machine?
We've been booting other configs in QEMU for a few years now, so I don't see why yet another config would hurt. Maybe there's some hardware dependency, but I guess we'd find that out trying to boot it in QEMU. If it boots in QEMU, I guess not booting on metal wasn't so bad? Maybe this is considered an antipattern, but you can see how if we've been getting away with it for years then that would lead to such expectations.
(whatever it is) Or does QEMU emulate a milbeaut machine?
$ qemu-system-arm -machine help doesn't print anything that looks like it, on initial glance. Looks like a socionext part: https://www.socionext.com/en/pr/sn_pr20170105_01e.pdf
If not, better to stick with configs that are intended to boot on the QEMU machine emulation that you are using.
I can see in our CI that we've been building+boot testing multi_v5_defconfig, aspeed_g5_defconfig, and multi_v7_defconfig for a while now without specifying any machine. Is there a preferred machine we should be using for those? (It looks like qemu supports ast2500-evb and ast2600-evb; is ARM1176 and ARMv6 core? Is that what aspeed_g5 uses? Why is virt versioned? Ahhhh!!!!)
Also, while I see the point of regression testing of -next, using it as a base to test arbitrary series and then report failures against it produces a lot of noise. -next is *not* a good base for development, because you get everybody else's half baked crap as well.
Ack.
When you test my stuff, please use a known good base so we're not off on a goose chase every time.
Goose Chase?! gOoSe ChAsE?! *gestures broadly at...everything* Monsieur, here at the zoo, chasing the geese is not out of our purview. It's preferable to cleaning up after the elephants. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel