Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: ti: Add support for J7200 SoC
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Date: 2020-09-08 19:50:39
Also in:
linux-devicetree
On 12:04-20200827, Suman Anna wrote: will just piggy on this thread..
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..70c8f7e941fb --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Device Tree Source for J7200 SoC Family Main Domain peripherals + * + * Copyright (C) 2020 Texas Instruments Incorporated - https://www.ti.com/ + */ + +&cbass_main { + msmc_ram: sram@70000000 { + compatible = "mmio-sram"; + reg = <0x0 0x70000000 0x0 0x100000>;nit, I prefer that we use a consistent style across all nodes. Most of the places we are using 0x00 on the first cells of address and size.
yes please. Will be great if you could address this.
[...]
quoted
+ + main_pmx0: pinmux@11c000 { + compatible = "pinctrl-single"; + /* Proxy 0 addressing */ + reg = <0x0 0x11c000 0x0 0x2b4>;This is the other node that uses a different style compared to all other nodes. Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Suman Anna <redacted> regards Suman
[..]
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200.dtsi new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..aadf707f25f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200.dtsi@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Device Tree Source for J7200 SoC Family + * + * Copyright (C) 2020 Texas Instruments Incorporated - https://www.ti.com/ + */ + +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> +#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/k3.h> +#include <dt-bindings/soc/ti,sci_pm_domain.h> + +/ { + model = "Texas Instruments K3 J7200 SoC"; + compatible = "ti,j7200"; + interrupt-parent = <&gic500>; + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + + aliases { + serial0 = &wkup_uart0; + serial1 = &mcu_uart0; + serial2 = &main_uart0; + serial3 = &main_uart1; + serial4 = &main_uart2; + serial5 = &main_uart3; + serial6 = &main_uart4; + serial7 = &main_uart5; + serial8 = &main_uart6; + serial9 = &main_uart7; + serial10 = &main_uart8; + serial11 = &main_uart9; + }; + + cpus { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + cpu-map { + cluster0: cluster0 { + core0 { + cpu = <&cpu0>; + }; + + core1 { + cpu = <&cpu1>; + }; + }; + + }; + + cpu0: cpu@0 { + compatible = "arm,cortex-a72"; + reg = <0x000>; + device_type = "cpu"; + enable-method = "psci"; + i-cache-size = <0xC000>;
minor nitpick comment -> 0xc000 ? I just saw j721e has the same as well.. heck.. I thought I found them all, but looks like I missed.
quoted
+ i-cache-line-size = <64>; + i-cache-sets = <256>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-line-size = <64>; + d-cache-sets = <128>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_0>; + }; + + cpu1: cpu@1 { + compatible = "arm,cortex-a72"; + reg = <0x001>; + device_type = "cpu"; + enable-method = "psci"; + i-cache-size = <0xC000>;
same..
quoted
+ i-cache-line-size = <64>; + i-cache-sets = <256>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-line-size = <64>; + d-cache-sets = <128>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_0>; + }; + }; +
Other wise, looks fine to me. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel