Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 3 authors, 2020-09-28

Re: [PATCH v11 6/6] docs: mm: numaperf.rst Add brief description for access class 1.

From: Randy Dunlap <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-28 19:27:10
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-api, linux-mm, lkml

Hi--

On 9/28/20 5:52 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Try to make minimal changes to the document which already describes
access class 0 in a generic fashion (including IO initiatiors that
are not CPUs).

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
---
 v11: No change.

 Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst
index 4d69ef1de830..b89bb85eac75 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -88,6 +93,9 @@ The latency attributes are provided in nanoseconds.
 The values reported here correspond to the rated latency and bandwidth
 for the platform.
 
+Access class 1, takes the same form, but only includes values for CPU to
+memory activity.
-ETOOMANYCOMMAS.

Drop the first comma for sure. Maybe even the second one.
+
 ==========
 NUMA Cache
 ==========
thanks.
-- 
~Randy


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help