Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 7 authors, 2021-03-11

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] PCI: dwc: improve msi handling

From: Jisheng Zhang <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-25 09:27:58
Also in: linux-amlogic, linux-arm-msm, linux-omap, linux-pci, linux-samsung-soc, linux-tegra, lkml
Subsystem: pci driver for synopsys designware, pci native host bridge and endpoint drivers, pci subsystem, the rest · Maintainers: Jingoo Han, Manivannan Sadhasivam, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Krzysztof Wilczyński, Bjorn Helgaas, Linus Torvalds

On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:17:12 +0800
Jisheng Zhang [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
CAUTION: Email originated externally, do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.


Hi Jon,

On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:53:45 +0100 Jon Hunter wrote:

quoted
On 24/09/2020 12:05, Jisheng Zhang wrote:  
quoted
Improve the msi code:
1. Add proper error handling.
2. Move dw_pcie_msi_init() from each users to designware host to solve
msi page leakage in resume path.  
Apologies if this is slightly off topic, but I have been meaning to ask
about MSIs and PCI. On Tegra194 which uses the DWC PCI driver, whenever we
hotplug CPUs we see the following warnings ...

 [      79.068351] WARNING KERN IRQ70: set affinity failed(-22).
 [      79.068362] WARNING KERN IRQ71: set affinity failed(-22).

These interrupts are the MSIs ...

70:          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0   PCI-MSI 134217728 Edge      PCIe PME, aerdrv
71:          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0   PCI-MSI 134742016 Edge      ahci[0001:01:00.0]

This caused because ...

 static int dw_pci_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
                                    const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
 {
         return -EINVAL;
 }

Now the above is not unique to the DWC PCI host driver, it appears that
most PCIe drivers also do the same. However, I am curious if there is
any way to avoid the above warnings given that setting the affinity does
not appear to be supported in anyway AFAICT.
 

Could you please try below patch?

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
index bf25d783b5c5..7e5dc54d060e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
@@ -197,7 +197,6 @@ static struct irq_chip dw_pci_msi_bottom_irq_chip = {
        .name = "DWPCI-MSI",
        .irq_ack = dw_pci_bottom_ack,
        .irq_compose_msi_msg = dw_pci_setup_msi_msg,
-       .irq_set_affinity = dw_pci_msi_set_affinity,
        .irq_mask = dw_pci_bottom_mask,
        .irq_unmask = dw_pci_bottom_unmask,
 };
A complete patch w/o compiler warning:
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
index bf25d783b5c5..18f719cfed0b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
@@ -137,12 +137,6 @@ static void dw_pci_setup_msi_msg(struct irq_data *d, struct msi_msg *msg)
 		(int)d->hwirq, msg->address_hi, msg->address_lo);
 }
 
-static int dw_pci_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
-				   const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
-{
-	return -EINVAL;
-}
-
 static void dw_pci_bottom_mask(struct irq_data *d)
 {
 	struct pcie_port *pp = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
@@ -197,7 +191,6 @@ static struct irq_chip dw_pci_msi_bottom_irq_chip = {
 	.name = "DWPCI-MSI",
 	.irq_ack = dw_pci_bottom_ack,
 	.irq_compose_msi_msg = dw_pci_setup_msi_msg,
-	.irq_set_affinity = dw_pci_msi_set_affinity,
 	.irq_mask = dw_pci_bottom_mask,
 	.irq_unmask = dw_pci_bottom_unmask,
 };
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help