Re: [PATCH 06/14] Fix CFLAGS for UBSAN_BOUNDS on Clang
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Date: 2020-09-15 18:44:43
Also in:
kvmarm, linux-kbuild, lkml
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 14:01, George Popescu [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 01:18:11PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:quoted
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 12:25, George Popescu [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 03:13:14PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:quoted
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 05:27:42PM +0000, George-Aurelian Popescu wrote:quoted
From: George Popescu <redacted> When the kernel is compiled with Clang, UBSAN_BOUNDS inserts a brk after the handler call, preventing it from printing any information processed inside the buffer. For Clang -fsanitize=bounds expands to -fsanitize=array-bounds and -fsanitize=local-bounds, and the latter adds a brk after the handler callThis would mean losing the local-bounds coverage. I tried to test it without local-bounds and with a locally defined array on the stack and it works fine (the handler is called and the error reported). For me it feels like --array-bounds and --local-bounds are triggered for the same type of undefined_behaviours but they are handling them different.Does -fno-sanitize-trap=bounds help?>I tried replacing it with: ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fno-sanitize-trap=bounds) CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=bounds) else CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=bounds) endif The code traps.
What's your config? Do you have CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP=y? If so, you have 2 options: honor UBSAN_TRAP and crash the kernel, or have a 'CFLAGS_REMOVE_... = -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error' for the files where you can't deal with traps. Thanks, -- Marco _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel