Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 4 authors, 2020-09-28

Re: [PATCH 5/9] ARM: oabi-compat: rework epoll_wait/epoll_pwait emulation

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2020-09-08 20:56:52
Also in: linux-arch, linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 8:20 AM Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
@@ -264,68 +266,24 @@ asmlinkage long sys_oabi_epoll_ctl(int epfd, int op, int fd,
      return do_epoll_ctl(epfd, op, fd, &kernel, false);
 }

-static long do_oabi_epoll_wait(int epfd, struct oabi_epoll_event __user *events,
-                            int maxevents, int timeout)
+struct epoll_event __user *
+epoll_put_uevent(__poll_t revents, __u64 data, struct epoll_event __user *uevent)
 {
+     if (in_oabi_syscall()) {
+             struct oabi_epoll_event *oevent = (void __user *)uevent;

+             if (__put_user(revents, &oevent->events) ||
+                 __put_user(data, &oevent->data))
+                     return NULL;

+             return (void __user *)uevent+1;
FWIW, this line needs to be

         return (void __user *)(oevent+1);

It turns out that while I thought I had tested this already, my earlier
tests were on the EABI Debian 5 instead of the OABI version of the
same distro. I reproduced it both ways now and LTP successfully
found that bug ;-)
I wonder if we'd be better off doing the in_oabi_syscall() branch in
the common code.  E.g. rename in_oabi_syscall to in_legacy_syscall and
stub it out for all other architectures.  Then just do

        if (in_oabi_syscall()
                legacy_syscall_foo_bit();
        else
                normal_syscall_foo_bit();

in common code, where so far only arm provides
legacy_syscall_foo_bit().
I tried out different ways, the first one I had was with an #ifdef in the
C code that I did not like much.

Moving the different code path into common code would avoid that
#ifdef but also put the rather obscure oabi-compat code into a
much more prominent location. I'd prefer to keep it out of there
as much as possible and hope we don't need to do this anywhere
else. x86-32 has some similar issues with struct layout, but that
already goes through the normal compat layer on 64-bit kernels.
Tons of long lines again in this patch..
Fixed now.

       Arnd

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help