On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 07:31:39PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
quoted
Real time (s) Max RSS (KiB)
anon 2.237081 107088
memset 2.252241 112180
refpage 2.243786 107128
We can see that RSS for refpage is almost the same as anon, and real
time overhead is 44% that of memset.
Are some of the numbers stale, maybe? Try as I might, I cannot combine
anything above to come up with 44%. :)
You're not trying hard enough ;-)
(2.252241 - 2.237081) / 2.237081 = .00677668801442594166
(2.243786 - 2.237081) / 2.237081 = .00299720930981041812
.00299720930981041812 / .00677668801442594166 = .44228232189973614648
tadaa!
As I said last time this was posted, I'm just not excited by this. We go
from having a 0.68% time overhead down to an 0.30% overhead, which just
doesn't move the needle for me. Maybe there's a better benchmark than
this to show benefits from this patchset.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel