Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] clk: sunxi-ng: sun8i: r40: Use sigma delta modulation for audio PLL
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <hidden>
Date: 2020-08-25 14:46:52
Also in:
linux-clk, lkml
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 9:11 PM Jernej Skrabec [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Audio cores need specific clock rates which can't be simply obtained by adjusting integer multipliers and dividers. HW for such cases supports delta-sigma modulation which enables fractional multipliers. Port H3 delta-sigma table to R40. They have identical audio PLLs. Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <redacted> --- drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-r40.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-r40.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-r40.c index 23bfe1d12f21..84153418453f 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-r40.c +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-r40.c@@ -45,18 +45,29 @@ static struct ccu_nkmp pll_cpu_clk = { * the base (2x, 4x and 8x), and one variable divider (the one true * pll audio). * - * We don't have any need for the variable divider for now, so we just - * hardcode it to match with the clock names + * With sigma-delta modulation for fractional-N on the audio PLL, + * we have to use specific dividers. This means the variable divider + * can no longer be used, as the audio codec requests the exact clock + * rates we support through this mechanism. So we now hard code the + * variable divider to 1. This means the clock rates will no longer + * match the clock names. */ #define SUN8I_R40_PLL_AUDIO_REG 0x008 -static SUNXI_CCU_NM_WITH_GATE_LOCK(pll_audio_base_clk, "pll-audio-base", - "osc24M", 0x008, - 8, 7, /* N */ - 0, 5, /* M */ - BIT(31), /* gate */ - BIT(28), /* lock */ - CLK_SET_RATE_UNGATE); +static struct ccu_sdm_setting pll_audio_sdm_table[] = { + { .rate = 22579200, .pattern = 0xc0010d84, .m = 8, .n = 7 }, + { .rate = 24576000, .pattern = 0xc000ac02, .m = 14, .n = 14 },
The user manual has an additional requirement: 3 <= N/M <= 21. Though it then says 72 <= 24*N/P <= 504. Not sure which one is right... Did you run into any glitches or audio distortions? ChenYu _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel