On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 10:47, Alexandre Belloni
[off-list ref] wrote:

On 25/08/2020 09:33:45+0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 at 17:10, Lars Povlsen [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

The Sparx5 SDHCI controller is based on the Designware controller IP.

Signed-off-by: Lars Povlsen <redacted>
---
 .../mmc/microchip,dw-sparx5-sdhci.yaml        | 65 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/microchip,dw-sparx5-sdhci.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/microchip,dw-sparx5-sdhci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/microchip,dw-sparx5-sdhci.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..55883290543b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/microchip,dw-sparx5-sdhci.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mmc/microchip,dw-sparx5-sdhci.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Microchip Sparx5 Mobile Storage Host Controller Binding
+
+allOf:
+  - $ref: "mmc-controller.yaml"
+
+maintainers:
+  - Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>
+
+# Everything else is described in the common file
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: microchip,dw-sparx5-sdhci
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  interrupts:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  clocks:
+    maxItems: 1
+    description:
+      Handle to "core" clock for the sdhci controller.
+
+  clock-names:
+    items:
+      - const: core
+
+  microchip,clock-delay:
+    description: Delay clock to card to meet setup time requirements.
+      Each step increase by 1.25ns.
+    $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32"
+    minimum: 1
+    maximum: 15
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - interrupts
+  - clocks
+  - clock-names
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
+    #include <dt-bindings/clock/microchip,sparx5.h>
+    sdhci0: mmc@600800000 {

Nitpick:

I think we should use solely "mmc[n]" here. So:

mmc0@600800000 {

Please update patch3/3 accordingly as well.

This is not what the devicetree specification says. 2.2.2 says that the
generic name is mmc, not mmc[n]. Since there is a proper unit-address, I
don't see the need for an index here.

You are absolutely right, thanks!

My apologies for the noise!

quoted

quoted

+        compatible = "microchip,dw-sparx5-sdhci";
+        reg = <0x00800000 0x1000>;
+        pinctrl-0 = <&emmc_pins>;
+        pinctrl-names = "default";
+        clocks = <&clks CLK_ID_AUX1>;
+        clock-names = "core";
+        assigned-clocks = <&clks CLK_ID_AUX1>;
+        assigned-clock-rates = <800000000>;
+        interrupts = <GIC_SPI 4 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+        bus-width = <8>;
+        microchip,clock-delay = <10>;
+    };

Kind regards
Uffe

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel