Re: [PATCH v6 05/12] mm: HUGE_VMAP arch support cleanup
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-08-21 22:46:00
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm, linuxppc-dev, lkml
Excerpts from Andrew Morton's message of August 22, 2020 6:14 am:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 01:12:09 +1000 Nicholas Piggin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This changes the awkward approach where architectures provide init functions to determine which levels they can provide large mappings for, to one where the arch is queried for each call. This removes code and indirection, and allows constant-folding of dead code for unsupported levels. This also adds a prot argument to the arch query. This is unused currently but could help with some architectures (e.g., some powerpc processors can't map uncacheable memory with large pages).--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/vmalloc.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/vmalloc.h@@ -1,4 +1,12 @@ #ifndef _ASM_ARM64_VMALLOC_H #define _ASM_ARM64_VMALLOC_H +#include <asm/page.h> + +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP +bool arch_vmap_p4d_supported(pgprot_t prot); +bool arch_vmap_pud_supported(pgprot_t prot); +bool arch_vmap_pmd_supported(pgprot_t prot); +#endifMoving these out of generic code and into multiple arch headers is unfortunate. Can we leave them in include/linux/somewhere? And remove the ifdefs, if so inclined - they just move the build error from link-time to compile-time, and such an error shouldn't occur!
Yeah this was just an intermediate step as you saw. It's a bit unfortunate, but I thought it made the arch changes clearer. Thanks, Nick _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel