On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 05:41:43PM +0200, Lukasz Stelmach wrote:
It was <2020-08-19 śro 14:48>, when Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 02:32:06PM +0200, Łukasz Stelmach wrote:
quoted
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@samsung.com>
---
drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
Oh, come on, stop fixing the same local issue without fixing bigger
picture... or at least documenting why bigger picture does not have to be
fixed and simple 'return' is enough.
That's the third, same fix for the same problem.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190314064202.14864-1-kjlu@umn.edu/ (local)
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20170207204520.h2eo3yn5kge56lk7@kozik-lap/ (local)
No wonder. There is a possible NULL dereference below. Now at least we
know something about conditions that led to this.
Should I drop the entire patch, or just the dmaengine_prep_slave_sg() part?
The best would be to really go through the call stack and handle the
error properly.
This means returning an error code and propagating it further. It is not
a trivial change...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel