Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 3 authors, 2020-08-19
STALE2114d
Revisions (3)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v3 current

[PATCH v3 06/17] riscv: drop unneeded node initialization

From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-08-18 15:18:29
Also in: linux-arch, linux-iommu, linux-mips, linux-mm, linux-riscv, linux-s390, linux-sh, linuxppc-dev, lkml, sparclinux
Subsystem: risc-v architecture, the rest · Maintainers: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Linus Torvalds

From: Mike Rapoport <redacted>

RISC-V does not (yet) support NUMA  and for UMA architectures node 0 is
used implicitly during early memory initialization.

There is no need to call memblock_set_node(), remove this call and the
surrounding code.

Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <redacted>
---
 arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 9 ---------
 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
index 787c75f751a5..0485cfaacc72 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
@@ -191,15 +191,6 @@ void __init setup_bootmem(void)
 	early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem();
 	memblock_allow_resize();
 	memblock_dump_all();
-
-	for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
-		unsigned long start_pfn = memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg);
-		unsigned long end_pfn = memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg);
-
-		memblock_set_node(PFN_PHYS(start_pfn),
-				  PFN_PHYS(end_pfn - start_pfn),
-				  &memblock.memory, 0);
-	}
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
-- 
2.26.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help