On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 1:20 AM Jiaxin Yu [off-list ref] wrote:
+static int mt6359_platform_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
[snip]
+
+ return devm_snd_soc_register_component(&pdev->dev,
+ &mt6359_soc_component_driver,
+ mt6359_dai_driver,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(mt6359_dai_driver));
+}
+
+static int mt6359_platform_driver_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct mt6359_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
+ int ret;
+
+ dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "%s(), dev name %s\n",
+ __func__, dev_name(&pdev->dev));
+
+ ret = regulator_disable(priv->avdd_reg);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s(), failed to disable regulator!\n",
+ __func__);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ snd_soc_unregister_component(&pdev->dev);
You don't need to unregister the component which is already delegated to devm.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel