Re: [PATCH 00/44] SPMI patches needed by Hikey 970
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-08-12 18:48:00
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, lkml
Em Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:13:51 -0700 Joe Perches [off-list ref] escreveu:
Perhaps these trivial bits on top:
Sounds fine for me. Feel free to send it with your SOB, adding my reviewed by: Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hi6421-spmi-pmic.c | 5 +++-- drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hi6421v600-regulator.c | 6 +++--- drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hisi-spmi-controller.c | 21 +++++++++++++-------- 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hi6421-spmi-pmic.c b/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hi6421-spmi-pmic.c index 76766e7b8bf9..9d73458ca65a 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hi6421-spmi-pmic.c +++ b/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hi6421-spmi-pmic.c@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ int hi6421_spmi_pmic_write(struct hi6421_spmi_pmic *pmic, int reg, u32 val) EXPORT_SYMBOL(hi6421_spmi_pmic_write); int hi6421_spmi_pmic_rmw(struct hi6421_spmi_pmic *pmic, int reg, - u32 mask, u32 bits) + u32 mask, u32 bits) { unsigned long flags; u32 data;@@ -130,7 +130,8 @@ static irqreturn_t hi6421_spmi_irq_handler(int irq, void *data) hi6421_spmi_pmic_write(pmic, (i + pmic->irq_addr), pending); /* solve powerkey order */ - if ((i == HISI_IRQ_KEY_NUM) && ((pending & HISI_IRQ_KEY_VALUE) == HISI_IRQ_KEY_VALUE)) { + if ((i == HISI_IRQ_KEY_NUM) && + ((pending & HISI_IRQ_KEY_VALUE) == HISI_IRQ_KEY_VALUE)) { generic_handle_irq(pmic->irqs[HISI_IRQ_KEY_DOWN]); generic_handle_irq(pmic->irqs[HISI_IRQ_KEY_UP]); pending &= (~HISI_IRQ_KEY_VALUE);diff --git a/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hi6421v600-regulator.c b/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hi6421v600-regulator.c index 29ef6bcadd84..82635ff54a74 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hi6421v600-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hi6421v600-regulator.c@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static int hi6421_spmi_dt_parse(struct platform_device *pdev, ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "reg", &rdesc->enable_reg); if (ret) { - dev_err(dev, "missing reg property\nn"); + dev_err(dev, "missing reg property\n"); return ret; }@@ -303,13 +303,13 @@ static int hi6421_spmi_dt_parse(struct platform_device *pdev, */ rdesc->vsel_mask = (1 << (fls(rdesc->n_voltages) - 1)) - 1; - dev_dbg(dev, "voltage selector settings: reg: 0x%x, mask: 0x%x", + dev_dbg(dev, "voltage selector settings: reg: 0x%x, mask: 0x%x\n", rdesc->vsel_reg, rdesc->vsel_mask); return 0; } -static struct regulator_ops hi6421_spmi_ldo_rops = { +static const struct regulator_ops hi6421_spmi_ldo_rops = { .is_enabled = hi6421_spmi_regulator_is_enabled, .enable = hi6421_spmi_regulator_enable, .disable = hi6421_spmi_regulator_disable,diff --git a/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hisi-spmi-controller.c b/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hisi-spmi-controller.c index 583df10cbf1a..513d962b8bce 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hisi-spmi-controller.c +++ b/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hisi-spmi-controller.c@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int spmi_controller_wait_for_done(struct device *dev, return 0; } udelay(1); - } while(timeout--); + } while (timeout--); dev_err(dev, "%s: timeout, status 0x%x\n", __func__, status); return -ETIMEDOUT;@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, if (bc > SPMI_CONTROLLER_MAX_TRANS_BYTES) { dev_err(&ctrl->dev, - "spmi_controller supports 1..%d bytes per trans, but:%ld requested", + "spmi_controller supports 1..%d bytes per trans, but:%ld requested\n", SPMI_CONTROLLER_MAX_TRANS_BYTES, bc); return -EINVAL; }@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, op_code = SPMI_CMD_EXT_REG_READ_L; break; default: - dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "invalid read cmd 0x%x", opc); + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "invalid read cmd 0x%x\n", opc); return -EINVAL; }@@ -157,7 +157,10 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, goto done; for (i = 0; bc > i * SPMI_PER_DATAREG_BYTE; i++) { - data = readl(spmi_controller->base + chnl_ofst + SPMI_SLAVE_OFFSET * slave_id + SPMI_APB_SPMI_RDATA0_BASE_ADDR + i * SPMI_PER_DATAREG_BYTE); + data = readl(spmi_controller->base + chnl_ofst + + SPMI_SLAVE_OFFSET * slave_id + + SPMI_APB_SPMI_RDATA0_BASE_ADDR + + i * SPMI_PER_DATAREG_BYTE); data = be32_to_cpu((__be32)data); if ((bc - i * SPMI_PER_DATAREG_BYTE) >> 2) { memcpy(buf, &data, sizeof(data));@@ -194,7 +197,7 @@ static int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, if (bc > SPMI_CONTROLLER_MAX_TRANS_BYTES) { dev_err(&ctrl->dev, - "spmi_controller supports 1..%d bytes per trans, but:%ld requested", + "spmi_controller supports 1..%d bytes per trans, but:%ld requested\n", SPMI_CONTROLLER_MAX_TRANS_BYTES, bc); return -EINVAL; }@@ -210,7 +213,7 @@ static int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, op_code = SPMI_CMD_EXT_REG_WRITE_L; break; default: - dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "invalid write cmd 0x%x", opc); + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "invalid write cmd 0x%x\n", opc); return -EINVAL; }@@ -234,8 +237,10 @@ static int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, } writel((u32)cpu_to_be32(data), - spmi_controller->base + chnl_ofst + SPMI_APB_SPMI_WDATA0_BASE_ADDR + SPMI_PER_DATAREG_BYTE * i); - }; + spmi_controller->base + chnl_ofst + + SPMI_APB_SPMI_WDATA0_BASE_ADDR + + SPMI_PER_DATAREG_BYTE * i); + } /* Start the transaction */ writel(cmd, spmi_controller->base + chnl_ofst + SPMI_APB_SPMI_CMD_BASE_ADDR);
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel