Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] irqchip/qcom-pdc: Switch to using IRQCHIP_PLATFORM_DRIVER helper macros
From: Steev Klimaszewski <hidden>
Date: 2020-08-05 21:47:42
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek, lkml
On 8/5/20 4:16 PM, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
On 8/5/20 3:19 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:quoted
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 12:44 AM John Stultz [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
<sigh> So this is where I bashfully admit I didn't get a chance to try this patch series out, as I had success with a much older version of Saravana's macro magic. But unfortunately, now that this has landed in mainline, I'm seeing boot regressions on db845c. :( This is in the non-modular case, building the driver in.Does that mean the modular version is working? Or you haven't tried that yet? I'll wait for your reply before I try to fix it. I don't have the hardware, but it should be easy to guess this issue looking at the code delta.For what it's worth, I saw this too on the Lenovo C630 (started on -next around 20200727, but I didn't track it down as, well, there's less way to get debug output on the C630. In my testing, module or built-in doesn't matter, but reverting does allow me to boot again.
Actually - I spoke too soon - QCOM_PDC built-in with the commit reverted boots, however, module (on the c630 at least) doesn't boot whether it's a module or built-in.
quoted
The only significant change from what your probe function is doing is this snippet. But it'd be surprising if this only affects the builtin case. + if (par_np == np) + par_np = NULL; + + /* + * If there's a parent interrupt controller and none of the parent irq + * domains have been registered, that means the parent interrupt + * controller has not been initialized yet. it's not time for this + * interrupt controller to initialize. So, defer probe of this + * interrupt controller. The actual initialization callback of this + * interrupt controller can check for specific domains as necessary. + */ + if (par_np && !irq_find_matching_host(np, DOMAIN_BUS_ANY)) + return -EPROBE_DEFER;quoted
I managed to bisect it down to this patch, and reverting it avoids the issue. I don't see what is wrong right off, but I really need to get to bed, so I'll dig further tomorrow. Saravana: Apologies for not getting around to testing this beforehand!No worries. Apologies for breaking it accidentally. -Saravana
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel