Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq statistics retrieved by drivers
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-08-05 17:35:57
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-08-05 17:35:57
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
On 8/5/2020 9:03 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 06:34:36PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:quoted
On 05-08-20, 12:04, Lukasz Luba wrote:quoted
I know that Viresh is going to develop patches and improve these cpufreq stats framework. Maybe he also had this 'aggregation' in mind. I will leave it him.I am only going to look at cpufreq's view of stats independently from the firmware.+1, I agree with that. Kernel must avoid any logic to aggregate or interpret the data in a generic way. The userspace tools can manage that especially if this tend to be platform specific.
We can probably standardize on how to expose the firmware maintained statistics such that these tools do not have to widely vary from platform to platform, right? -- Florian _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel