Re: [PATCH] tty: xilinx_uartps: Really fix id assignment
From: Maarten Brock <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-13 16:09:49
Also in:
linux-serial
On 2020-07-13 14:10, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Hi Michal, On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 01:49:38PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:quoted
On 13. 07. 20 9:11, Helmut Grohne wrote:quoted
Let me try to enumerate those I know: uart0 | uart1 | console | remark ---------+----------+---------+---------- serial0 | serial1 | ttyPS0 | regular case serial0 | serial1 | ttyPS1 | normal assignment, second console serial1 | serial0 | ttyPS0 | -> Jan Kiszka, broken since revert disabled | serial0 | ttyPS0 | use only uart1 as serial0 serial0 | disabled | ttyPS0 | regular case with uart1 disabled Out of these, I'm actively using configurations 3 and 4. Which of these scenarios do you test already?For above we are missing also others serial1 | serial0 | ttyPS1 disabled| serial1 | ttyPS1Is it actually possible to have ttyPS1, but no ttyPS0? I think I tried doing that earlier and it resulted in there being ttyPS0, but no ttyPS1.
What if you also have a 16550 (in the PL) and give it the serial0 alias? Or a UARTlite? The serialN alias is inappropriate to set the number for ttyPSn. How are you supposed to create all of ttyPS0, ttyS0 and ttyUL0 using a single serial0 alias?
quoted
serial1 | disables | ttyPS0I'm not sure what this is supposed to mean. When there is no serial0 alias, I'd expect ttyPS0 to be missing. However as indicated above that is not what happens in practice. So either of these two configurations seems invalid to me.quoted
All of these above are just not setting any console= on bootargs.We usually set the console= assignment on bootargs.quoted
It means mix of these combinations is tested regularly but not all of them. Do you see any other combination which is not supported?I'm not aware of further relevant combinations. Can we maybe trim down the matrix somehow? In my context, the need for swapping the serial aliases arises from a limitation in u-boot-xlnx and the desire to use one dtb for both linux and u-boot. It requires that the serial0 alias is the console. Are there other reasons to swap them? If not, maybe fixing u-boot would be an option? Helmut
I think that it would be better if u-boot used a "console" alias. Maarten _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel