Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] input: gpio-vibra: Allow to use vcc-supply alone to control the vibrator
From: Ondřej Jirman <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-30 09:18:18
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-input, lkml
Hello Dmitry, thanks for looking into the patch. :) On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:19:39PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi Ondrej, On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:23:01PM +0200, Ondrej Jirman wrote:quoted
Make enable-gpio optional to allow using this driver with boards that have vibrator connected to a power supply without intermediate gpio based enable circuitry. Also avoid a case where neither regulator nor enable gpio is specified, and bail out in probe in such a case. Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman <redacted> --- drivers/input/misc/gpio-vibra.c | 14 ++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/gpio-vibra.c b/drivers/input/misc/gpio-vibra.c index f79f75595dd7..b3bb7e61ed1d 100644 --- a/drivers/input/misc/gpio-vibra.c +++ b/drivers/input/misc/gpio-vibra.c@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static int gpio_vibrator_start(struct gpio_vibrator *vibrator) struct device *pdev = vibrator->input->dev.parent; int err; - if (!vibrator->vcc_on) { + if (vibrator->vcc && !vibrator->vcc_on) { err = regulator_enable(vibrator->vcc); if (err) { dev_err(pdev, "failed to enable regulator: %d\n", err);@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static void gpio_vibrator_stop(struct gpio_vibrator *vibrator) { gpiod_set_value_cansleep(vibrator->gpio, 0); - if (vibrator->vcc_on) { + if (vibrator->vcc && vibrator->vcc_on) { regulator_disable(vibrator->vcc); vibrator->vcc_on = false; }@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static int gpio_vibrator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (!vibrator->input) return -ENOMEM; - vibrator->vcc = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "vcc"); + vibrator->vcc = devm_regulator_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "vcc");I know it is very surprising, but regulator_get_optional does not return NULL when regulator is not present, but rather ERR_PTR(-ENODEV). You need to replace it with NULL in the branch below, or change conditions to !IS_ERR(virbrator->vcc) (and still handle -ENODEV in the branch below).
Oops, I'll fix that in the next revision. regards, o.
quoted
err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(vibrator->vcc); if (err) { if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER)@@ -121,7 +121,8 @@ static int gpio_vibrator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return err; } - vibrator->gpio = devm_gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "enable", GPIOD_OUT_LOW); + vibrator->gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "enable", + GPIOD_OUT_LOW); err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(vibrator->gpio); if (err) { if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER)@@ -130,6 +131,11 @@ static int gpio_vibrator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return err; } + if (!vibrator->vcc && !vibrator->gpio) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Neither gpio nor regulator provided\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + INIT_WORK(&vibrator->play_work, gpio_vibrator_play_work); vibrator->input->name = "gpio-vibrator";-- 2.27.0Thanks. -- Dmitry
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel