Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 2 authors, 2020-07-30

Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] input: gpio-vibra: Allow to use vcc-supply alone to control the vibrator

From: Ondřej Jirman <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-30 09:18:18
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-input, lkml

Hello Dmitry,

thanks for looking into the patch. :)

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:19:39PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi Ondrej,

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:23:01PM +0200, Ondrej Jirman wrote:
quoted
Make enable-gpio optional to allow using this driver with boards that
have vibrator connected to a power supply without intermediate gpio
based enable circuitry.

Also avoid a case where neither regulator nor enable gpio is specified,
and bail out in probe in such a case.

Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman <redacted>
---
 drivers/input/misc/gpio-vibra.c | 14 ++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/gpio-vibra.c b/drivers/input/misc/gpio-vibra.c
index f79f75595dd7..b3bb7e61ed1d 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/gpio-vibra.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/gpio-vibra.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static int gpio_vibrator_start(struct gpio_vibrator *vibrator)
 	struct device *pdev = vibrator->input->dev.parent;
 	int err;
 
-	if (!vibrator->vcc_on) {
+	if (vibrator->vcc && !vibrator->vcc_on) {
 		err = regulator_enable(vibrator->vcc);
 		if (err) {
 			dev_err(pdev, "failed to enable regulator: %d\n", err);
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static void gpio_vibrator_stop(struct gpio_vibrator *vibrator)
 {
 	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(vibrator->gpio, 0);
 
-	if (vibrator->vcc_on) {
+	if (vibrator->vcc && vibrator->vcc_on) {
 		regulator_disable(vibrator->vcc);
 		vibrator->vcc_on = false;
 	}
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static int gpio_vibrator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!vibrator->input)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	vibrator->vcc = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "vcc");
+	vibrator->vcc = devm_regulator_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "vcc");
I know it is very surprising, but regulator_get_optional does not return
NULL when regulator is not present, but rather ERR_PTR(-ENODEV). You
need to replace it with NULL in the branch below, or change conditions
to !IS_ERR(virbrator->vcc) (and still handle -ENODEV in the branch
below).
Oops, I'll fix that in the next revision.

regards,
	o.
quoted
 	err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(vibrator->vcc);
 	if (err) {
 		if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER)
@@ -121,7 +121,8 @@ static int gpio_vibrator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return err;
 	}
 
-	vibrator->gpio = devm_gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "enable", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
+	vibrator->gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "enable",
+						 GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
 	err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(vibrator->gpio);
 	if (err) {
 		if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER)
@@ -130,6 +131,11 @@ static int gpio_vibrator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return err;
 	}
 
+	if (!vibrator->vcc && !vibrator->gpio) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Neither gpio nor regulator provided\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	INIT_WORK(&vibrator->play_work, gpio_vibrator_play_work);
 
 	vibrator->input->name = "gpio-vibrator";
-- 
2.27.0
Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help