Hi Qiushi,
On 13. 07. 20 21:41, Qiushi Wu wrote:
Hi Michal,
I think multiple previous patches also fixed similar problems, such as
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2404751/
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg2227849.html
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/patch/20200520095148.10995-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn/
But recently, people are discussing reimplementing
function pm_runtime_get_sync(), because it often misguides users and
introducing bugs.
So at this time point, I'm not sure if we should fix this issue in the
current version or wait for the new implementation of this API. : )
If we apply this patch then it needs to be reverted when API is fixed.
Is there any timeline mentioned?
If this will take some time I am fine with applying this patch.
Thanks,
Michal
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel