On Thu, 16 Jul 2020, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 01:56:13PM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Mark Brown wrote:
quoted
quoted
-void save_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace)
-{
- __save_stack_trace(current, trace, 0);
+ walk_stackframe(task, &frame, consume_entry, cookie);
}
quoted
just an idea for further improvement (and it might be a matter of taste).
Yeah, there's some more stuff that can be done - the reason I'm looking
at this code is to do reliable stack trace which is going to require at
least some changes to the actual unwinder, this just seemed like a
useful block moving things forwards in itself and I particularly wanted
feedback on patch 1.
Understood. Reliable stack traces would be an important step for live
patching on arm64, so I am looking forward to seeing that.
Thanks
Miroslav
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel