Re: [TEGRA194_CPUFREQ PATCH v5 3/4] cpufreq: Add Tegra194 cpufreq driver
From: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
Date: 2020-07-15 12:31:18
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pm, linux-tegra, lkml
Thank you for the review,
quoted
Add support for CPU frequency scaling on Tegra194. The frequency of each core can be adjusted by writing a clock divisor value to a MSR on the core. The range of valid divisors is queried from the BPMP. Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com> --- drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 6 + drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 + drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c | 397 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 404 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.cdiff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm index 15c1a12..f3d8f09 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm@@ -314,6 +314,12 @@ config ARM_TEGRA186_CPUFREQ help This adds the CPUFreq driver support for Tegra186 SOCs. +config ARM_TEGRA194_CPUFREQ + tristate "Tegra194 CPUFreq support" + depends on ARCH_TEGRA && TEGRA_BPMPShouldn't this depend on ARCH_TEGRA_194_SOC instead ? And I asked you to add a default y here itself instead of patch 4/4.
Ok.
quoted
+ help + This adds CPU frequency driver support for Tegra194 SOCs. + config ARM_TI_CPUFREQ bool "Texas Instruments CPUFreq support" depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUSdiff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile index f6670c4..66b5563 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_TANGO_CPUFREQ) += tango-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_TEGRA20_CPUFREQ) += tegra20-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_TEGRA124_CPUFREQ) += tegra124-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_TEGRA186_CPUFREQ) += tegra186-cpufreq.o +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_TEGRA194_CPUFREQ) += tegra194-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_TI_CPUFREQ) += ti-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_VEXPRESS_SPC_CPUFREQ) += vexpress-spc-cpufreq.odiff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c +static struct cpufreq_frequency_table * +init_freq_table(struct platform_device *pdev, struct tegra_bpmp *bpmp, + unsigned int cluster_id) +{ + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table; + struct mrq_cpu_ndiv_limits_response resp; + unsigned int num_freqs, ndiv, delta_ndiv; + struct mrq_cpu_ndiv_limits_request req; + struct tegra_bpmp_message msg; + u16 freq_table_step_size; + int err, index; + + memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req)); + req.cluster_id = cluster_id; + + memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg)); + msg.mrq = MRQ_CPU_NDIV_LIMITS; + msg.tx.data = &req; + msg.tx.size = sizeof(req); + msg.rx.data = &resp; + msg.rx.size = sizeof(resp); + + err = tegra_bpmp_transfer(bpmp, &msg); + if (err) + return ERR_PTR(err); + + /* + * Make sure frequency table step is a multiple of mdiv to match + * vhint table granularity. + */ + freq_table_step_size = resp.mdiv * + DIV_ROUND_UP(CPUFREQ_TBL_STEP_HZ, resp.ref_clk_hz); + + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "cluster %d: frequency table step size: %d\n", + cluster_id, freq_table_step_size); + + delta_ndiv = resp.ndiv_max - resp.ndiv_min; + + if (unlikely(delta_ndiv == 0)) + num_freqs = 1; + else + /* We store both ndiv_min and ndiv_max hence the +1 */ + num_freqs = delta_ndiv / freq_table_step_size + 1;You need {} in the if else blocks here because of the comment here.
Ok.
quoted
+ + num_freqs += (delta_ndiv % freq_table_step_size) ? 1 : 0; + + freq_table = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, num_freqs + 1, + sizeof(*freq_table), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!freq_table) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + + for (index = 0, ndiv = resp.ndiv_min; + ndiv < resp.ndiv_max; + index++, ndiv += freq_table_step_size) { + freq_table[index].driver_data = ndiv; + freq_table[index].frequency = map_ndiv_to_freq(&resp, ndiv); + } + + freq_table[index].driver_data = resp.ndiv_max; + freq_table[index++].frequency = map_ndiv_to_freq(&resp, resp.ndiv_max); + freq_table[index].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; + + return freq_table; +} + +static int tegra194_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct tegra194_cpufreq_data *data; + struct tegra_bpmp *bpmp; + int err, i; + + data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!data) + return -ENOMEM; + + data->num_clusters = MAX_CLUSTERS; + data->tables = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, data->num_clusters, + sizeof(*data->tables), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!data->tables) + return -ENOMEM; + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data); + + bpmp = tegra_bpmp_get(&pdev->dev); + if (IS_ERR(bpmp)) + return PTR_ERR(bpmp); + + read_counters_wq = alloc_workqueue("read_counters_wq", __WQ_LEGACY, 1); + if (!read_counters_wq) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "fail to create_workqueue\n"); + err = -EINVAL; + goto put_bpmp; + } + + for (i = 0; i < data->num_clusters; i++) { + data->tables[i] = init_freq_table(pdev, bpmp, i); + if (IS_ERR(data->tables[i])) { + err = PTR_ERR(data->tables[i]); + goto err_free_res; + } + } + + tegra194_cpufreq_driver.driver_data = data; + + err = cpufreq_register_driver(&tegra194_cpufreq_driver); + if (err) + goto err_free_res; + + tegra_bpmp_put(bpmp); + + return err;rather just do: if (!err) goto put_bpmp;
Sure, will add in next version.
quoted
+ +err_free_res: + tegra194_cpufreq_free_resources(); +put_bpmp: + tegra_bpmp_put(bpmp); + return err; +}-- viresh
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel