Re: [PATCH 12/21] iommu/mediatek: Add iova reserved function
From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Date: 2020-07-14 09:33:56
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-iommu, linux-mediatek, lkml
From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Date: 2020-07-14 09:33:56
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-iommu, linux-mediatek, lkml
On Mon, 2020-07-13 at 15:33 +0800, Pi-Hsun Shih wrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 2:51 PM Yong Wu [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
For multiple iommu_domains, we need to reserve some iova regions, so we will add mtk_iommu_iova_region structure. It includes the base address and size of the range. This is a preparing patch for supporting multi-domain. Signed-off-by: Anan sun<redacted> Signed-off-by: Hao Chao<redacted> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> --- drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c index 03a6d66f4bef..fdfdb75706e0 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c@@ -151,6 +151,11 @@ static LIST_HEAD(m4ulist); /* List all the M4U HWs */... + +static void mtk_iommu_put_resv_regions(struct device *dev, + struct list_head *head) +{ + struct iommu_resv_region *entry, *next; + + list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, next, head, list) + kfree(entry); +} +This is the same as generic_iommu_put_resv_regions, use that as the .put_resv_regions callback instead?
Thanks very much for the review. Yes. I will fix it in next version.
quoted
... -- 2.18.0
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel