RE: [PATCH v3] serial: samsung: Re-factors UART IRQ resource for various Samsung SoC
From: M Tamseel Shams <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-14 00:57:31
Also in:
linux-samsung-soc, linux-serial, lkml
quoted
In few older Samsung SoCs like s3c2410, s3c2412 and s3c2440, UART IP is having 2 interrupt lines. However, in other SoCs like s3c6400, s5pv210, exynos5433, and exynos4210 UART is having only 1 interrupt line. Due to this, "platform_get_irq(platdev, 1)" call in the driver gives the following warning: "IRQ index 1 not found" on recent platforms. This patch re-factors the IRQ resources handling for each platform and hence fixing the above warnings seen on some platforms. Signed-off-by: Tamseel Shams <redacted> --- Removed the logic of irq_cnt and directly using s3c24xx_serial_has_interrupt_mask() to check for number of interrupt lines. drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.cb/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c index 6ef614d8648c..8a955f3d8975 100644--- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c@@ -1908,10 +1908,13 @@ static int s3c24xx_serial_init_port(structs3c24xx_uart_port *ourport,quoted
else { port->irq = ret; ourport->rx_irq = ret; - ourport->tx_irq = ret + 1; + if (s3c24xx_serial_has_interrupt_mask(port)) + ourport->tx_irq = ret;Hi, I don't understand: Why do you assign here the same interrupt as RX? Best regards, Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof, I was assigning the same interrupt to Tx and Rx for UART, which have one interrupt line, but ourport->tx_irq is never used for those UART's. So, leaving it as it was. The change now is using platform_get_irq_optional () instead of platform_get_irq () to avoid false-positive error. Thanks & Regards, Tamseel _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel