Re: [PATCH 3/4] mfd: mt6360: Fix flow which is used to check ic exist
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-07-10 14:25:29
Also in:
linux-mediatek, lkml
On 07/07/2020 12:30, Gene Chen wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Gene Chen <redacted> Fix flow which is used to check ic exist Signed-off-by: Gene Chen <redacted> --- drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++--------- include/linux/mfd/mt6360.h | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c index 2dd5918..4bb2949 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c@@ -293,6 +293,23 @@ static const struct mfd_cell mt6360_devs[] = { NULL, 0, 0, "mediatek,mt6360-tcpc"), }; +static int mt6360_check_vendor_info(struct mt6360_data *data) +{ + u32 info; + int ret; + + ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, MT6360_REG_PMU_DEVINFO, &info); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + if ((info & MT6360_CHIPVEN_MASK) != MT6360_CHIPVEN_VAL) + return -ENODEV; + + data->chip_rev = info & MT6360_CHIPREV_MASK; + + return 0; +} + static const unsigned short mt6360_slave_addr[MT6360_SLAVE_MAX] = { MT6360_PMU_SLAVEID, MT6360_PMIC_SLAVEID,@@ -303,7 +320,6 @@ static const unsigned short mt6360_slave_addr[MT6360_SLAVE_MAX] = { static int mt6360_probe(struct i2c_client *client) { struct mt6360_data *data; - unsigned int reg_data; int i, ret; data = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);@@ -319,16 +335,10 @@ static int mt6360_probe(struct i2c_client *client) return PTR_ERR(data->regmap); } - ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, MT6360_PMU_DEV_INFO, ®_data); + ret = mt6360_check_vendor_info(data); if (ret) { - dev_err(&client->dev, "Device not found\n"); - return ret; - } - - data->chip_rev = reg_data & CHIP_REV_MASK; - if (data->chip_rev != CHIP_VEN_MT6360) {
Why not only applying the MASK here instead of put this all in a new function?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
dev_err(&client->dev, "Device not supported\n"); - return -ENODEV; + return ret; } ret = devm_regmap_add_irq_chip(&client->dev, data->regmap, client->irq,diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/mt6360.h b/include/linux/mfd/mt6360.h index 9fc6718..5ec0f5d 100644 --- a/include/linux/mfd/mt6360.h +++ b/include/linux/mfd/mt6360.h@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ struct mt6360_data { }; /* PMU register defininition */ -#define MT6360_PMU_DEV_INFO (0x00) +#define MT6360_REG_PMU_DEVINFO (0x00) #define MT6360_PMU_CORE_CTRL1 (0x01) #define MT6360_PMU_RST1 (0x02) #define MT6360_PMU_CRCEN (0x03)@@ -233,8 +233,8 @@ struct mt6360_data { #define MT6360_IRQ_REGNUM 16 #define MT6360_IRQ_RETRIG BIT(2) -#define CHIP_VEN_MASK (0xF0) -#define CHIP_VEN_MT6360 (0x50) -#define CHIP_REV_MASK (0x0F) +#define MT6360_CHIPVEN_MASK (0xF0) +#define MT6360_CHIPVEN_VAL (0x50) +#define MT6360_CHIPREV_MASK (0x0F)
Same here as in the other patches. Don't just rename defines if there is no good reason. Regards, Matthias
#endif /* __MT6360_H__ */
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel