Thread (43 messages) 43 messages, 5 authors, 2020-09-29

Re: [PATCH v10 08/17] mtd: spi-nor: core: use dummy cycle and address width info from SFDP

From: <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-08 16:03:55
Also in: linux-mediatek, linux-spi, lkml

On 6/23/20 9:30 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe

The xSPI Profile 1.0 table specifies how many dummy cycles and address
bytes are needed for the Read Status Register command in octal DTR mode.
Use that information to send the correct Read SR command.

Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <redacted>
---
 drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
index 7d24e63fcca8..f2748f1d9957 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
@@ -357,6 +357,8 @@ int spi_nor_write_disable(struct spi_nor *nor)
 static int spi_nor_read_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 *sr)
 {
        int ret;
+       u8 addr_bytes = nor->params->rdsr_addr_nbytes;
+       u8 dummy = nor->params->rdsr_dummy;
no need to introduce local variables for a single dereference
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
        if (nor->spimem) {
                struct spi_mem_op op =
@@ -365,10 +367,21 @@ static int spi_nor_read_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 *sr)
                                   SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY,
                                   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(1, sr, 1));

+               if (spi_nor_protocol_is_dtr(nor->reg_proto)) {
+                       op.addr.nbytes = addr_bytes;
+                       op.addr.val = 0;
isn't addr already initialized to 0?
+                       op.dummy.nbytes = dummy;
+               }
+
+               spi_nor_spimem_setup_op(nor, &op, nor->reg_proto);
+
                ret = spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op);
        } else {
-               ret = nor->controller_ops->read_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_RDSR,
-                                                   sr, 1);
+               if (spi_nor_protocol_is_dtr(nor->reg_proto))
+                       ret = -ENOTSUPP;
+               else
+                       ret = nor->controller_ops->read_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_RDSR,
+                                                           sr, 1);
        }
doesn't this belong to a previous patch?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
        if (ret)
@@ -388,6 +401,8 @@ static int spi_nor_read_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 *sr)
 static int spi_nor_read_fsr(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 *fsr)
 {
        int ret;
+       u8 addr_bytes = nor->params->rdsr_addr_nbytes;
+       u8 dummy = nor->params->rdsr_dummy;

        if (nor->spimem) {
                struct spi_mem_op op =
@@ -396,6 +411,12 @@ static int spi_nor_read_fsr(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 *fsr)
                                   SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY,
                                   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(1, fsr, 1));

+               if (spi_nor_protocol_is_dtr(nor->reg_proto)) {
+                       op.addr.nbytes = addr_bytes;
+                       op.addr.val = 0;
+                       op.dummy.nbytes = dummy;
+               }
+
                spi_nor_spimem_setup_op(nor, &op, nor->reg_proto);

                ret = spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op);
--
2.27.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help