Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64/numa: export memory_add_physaddr_to_nid as EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
From: Dan Williams <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-08 03:56:51
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml, nvdimm
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 7:20 PM Justin He [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Hi Michal and Davidquoted
-----Original Message----- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 7:55 PM To: Justin He <redacted> Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>; Will Deacon [off-list ref]; Dan Williams [off-list ref]; Vishal Verma [off-list ref]; Dave Jiang [off-list ref]; Andrew Morton [off-list ref]; Mike Rapoport [off-list ref]; Baoquan He [off-list ref]; Chuhong Yuan [off-list ref]; linux- arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux- mm@kvack.org; linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org; Kaly Xin [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64/numa: export memory_add_physaddr_to_nid as EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL On Tue 07-07-20 13:59:15, Jia He wrote:quoted
This exports memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() for module driver to use. memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() is a fallback option to get the nid in case NUMA_NO_NID is detected. Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <redacted> Signed-off-by: Jia He <redacted> --- arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c index aafcee3e3f7e..7eeb31740248 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c@@ -464,10 +464,11 @@ void __init arm64_numa_init(void) /* * We hope that we will be hotplugging memory on nodes we already knowabout,quoted
- * such that acpi_get_node() succeeds and we never fall back to this... + * such that acpi_get_node() succeeds. But when SRAT is not present,the nodequoted
+ * id may be probed as NUMA_NO_NODE by acpi, Here provide a fallbackoption.quoted
*/ int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 addr) { - pr_warn("Unknown node for memory at 0x%llx, assuming node 0\n",addr);quoted
return 0; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memory_add_physaddr_to_nid);Does it make sense to export a noop function? Wouldn't make more sense to simply make it static inline somewhere in a header? I haven't checked whether there is an easy way to do that sanely bu this just hit my eyes.Okay, I can make a change in memory_hotplug.h, sth like:--- a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h +++ b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h@@ -149,13 +149,13 @@ int add_pages(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, struct mhp_params *params); #endif /* ARCH_HAS_ADD_PAGES */ -#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA -extern int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start); -#else +#if !defined(CONFIG_NUMA) || !defined(memory_add_physaddr_to_nid) static inline int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start) { return 0; } +#else +extern int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start); #endifAnd then check the memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() helper on all arches, if it is noop(return 0), I can simply remove it. if it is not noop, after the helper, #define memory_add_physaddr_to_nid What do you think of this proposal?
Especially for architectures that use memblock info for numa info
(which seems to be everyone except x86) why not implement a generic
memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() that does:
int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 addr)
{
unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn, pfn = PHYS_PFN(addr);
int nid;
for_each_online_node(nid) {
get_pfn_range_for_nid(nid, &start_pfn, &end_pfn);
if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn <= end_pfn)
return nid;
}
return NUMA_NO_NODE;
}
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel