Hello Greg,

Would you agree to take this series?

Regards.

On 18/06/2020 13:38, Marc Gonzalez wrote:

Hello everyone,

In my opinion, the small and simple devm_add() helper
(and its cousin, devm_vadd) can help make devm code
slightly easier to write and maintain.

Would anyone care to agree or disagree? :-)

Regards.

On 10/03/2020 11:11, Marc Gonzalez wrote:

quoted

Differences from v4 to v5
x Fix the grammar in devm_add comments [Geert]
x Undo an unrelated change in devm_clk_put [Geert]

Differences from v3 to v4
x Add a bunch of kerneldoc above devm_add() [Greg KH]
x Split patch in two [Greg KH]

Differences from v2 to v3
x Make devm_add() return an error-code rather than the raw data pointer
  (in case devres_alloc ever returns an ERR_PTR) as suggested by Geert
x Provide a variadic version devm_vadd() to work with structs as suggested
  by Geert
x Don't use nested ifs in clk_devm* implementations (hopefully simpler
  code logic to follow) as suggested by Geert

Marc Gonzalez (2):
  devres: Provide new helper for devm functions
  clk: Use devm_add in managed functions

 drivers/base/devres.c    | 28 ++++++++++++
 drivers/clk/clk-devres.c | 97 +++++++++++++++-------------------------
 include/linux/device.h   |  3 ++
 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel